<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The High Order Bit &#187; Business</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.evanadelman.com/category/business/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.evanadelman.com</link>
	<description>Mashup of my life. NYC, Technology, Business and now London</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 16:06:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>we&#8217;re having fun!</title>
		<link>http://www.evanadelman.com/2010/09/21/were-having-fun/</link>
		<comments>http://www.evanadelman.com/2010/09/21/were-having-fun/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 17:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>evanadelman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bucket]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.evanadelman.com/?p=72</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve had these two articles in front of me today &#8211; I couldn&#8217;t close either, and kept reading snippets of each one throughout the day. I had a hunch that they related to each other, but couldn&#8217;t quite figure out why.
My best friend from high school told this story of their family on vacation &#8211; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had these <a href="http://blogs.hbr.org/pallotta/2010/09/stop-comparing-yourself-with-s.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/blogs.hbr.org');" target="_blank">two</a> <a href="http://www.economist.com/node/17035923?story_id=17035923" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.economist.com');" target="_blank">articles</a> in front of me today &#8211; I couldn&#8217;t close either, and kept reading snippets of each one throughout the day. I had a hunch that they related to each other, but couldn&#8217;t quite figure out why.</p>
<p>My best friend from high school told this story of their family on vacation &#8211; on their way to their holiday destination, three kids in the back of the car, mom &amp; dad in front, they got a bit lost. A bit like <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iAgX6qlJEMc" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.youtube.com');" target="_blank">National Lampoons European vacation </a>(albeit somewhere in the Carolinas if memory serves) Dad G started driving around and around a traffic circle trying to determine which exit to take. Among the heated discussion of which way to go, someone lights up from the back &#8220;Dad, what are we doing!!?? (driving around the traffic circle when we&#8217;re supposed to be at the beach having fun already!)&#8221; &#8211; Dad replies in a stern shout &#8230;</p>
<p><strong>WE&#8217;RE HAVING FUN!!!</strong></p>
<p>I tell this story &#8211; no matter if my memory actually serves me well &#8211; often. The reply &#8211; ironically funny in it&#8217;s own right (especially as Rob tells it) &#8211; reminds me that you can&#8217;t force the end result. Fun / funny is simply a side effect &#8211; and you certainly can&#8217;t force it &#8211; other than in the ironic/watching-people-squirm sort of way (and you definitely don&#8217;t want that!).</p>
<p>The point of feeling fun &#8211; of feeling &#8216;buzy&#8217; &#8211; is that you&#8217;re actually <strong>doing </strong>something fun or as a result of success. It indicates that people are all on the same page, are relaxed, are doing anything other than supposedly having fun. Fun is the side benefit of the activity / mood. It&#8217;s not something you can really set out to have with any authenticity. Which is why the article in the Economist struck a chord with me. At first I thought that maybe I&#8217;m too cynical to believe the Zappos way could be fun &#8211; that sometimes work is &#8212; well, work. That bummed me right out, because of all times, I&#8217;m actually enjoying work these days. And that cynicism crept right up and hung off my back.</p>
<p>But then I circled back to the <a href="http://blogs.hbr.org/pallotta/2010/09/stop-comparing-yourself-with-s.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/blogs.hbr.org');" target="_blank">HBR</a> article one more time today and had a re-epiphany: set the goals of the team around performance, around risk, around ownership &#8211; anything other than around having fun. I hope that Zappos has the right priorities to enable their CEO&#8217;s vision of corporate culture. That somehow they&#8217;ve managed to align the  priorities of their employees in such a way that fun is the result. I  really wish <a href="http://about.zappos.com/our-unique-culture/zappos-core-values/create-fun-and-little-weirdness" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/about.zappos.com');" target="_blank">Create fun and a little weirdness</a> wasn&#8217;t in their list &#8211; but simply a footnote to their 10 principles. Maybe having that point 3 doesn&#8217;t insert employee cynicism within their organisation &#8211; but I think it gives every other leader a cop out. The copycats will focus on 3 and nothing else.</p>
<p>As <a href="http://www.economist.com/node/17035923?story_id=17035923" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.economist.com');">the Economist piece</a> points out, CEO&#8217;s who aim to mimic an environment of the Zappos case study focus on the end result &#8211; of the &#8220;FUN FUN&#8221; bit &#8211; and lose the focus that actually generates and enables fun in the first place. They lose the focus to create a stable, goal oriented, grounded workforce that&#8217;s able to take chances &#8211; that doesn&#8217;t feel scared to fail &#8211; that doesn&#8217;t mind a bit of egg on their face when they shoot too high. Not all companies can be Zappos from the ground up (and certainly not when a culture is already in place). Sure you have to learn and take points from others &#8211; but embrace who you are, what you can bring to the table, and what makes your company and employees tick. Only then will employees enjoy their success and maybe even learn to enjoy the opportunity to take a few lessons from a bit of failure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.evanadelman.com/2010/09/21/were-having-fun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Building families</title>
		<link>http://www.evanadelman.com/2008/12/17/building-families/</link>
		<comments>http://www.evanadelman.com/2008/12/17/building-families/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>evanadelman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.evanadelman.com/?p=20</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, with the Christmas holidays around the corner, family has been at the front of my mind. Mutant Media&#8217;s holiday gifts have been received by many, and thanks abound. Clients typically get the highlights, but we often send along something of appreciation for friends of the business and partners. A comment in response to such [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, with the Christmas holidays around the corner, family has been at the front of my mind. Mutant Media&#8217;s holiday gifts have been received by many, and thanks abound. Clients typically get the highlights, but we often send along something of appreciation for friends of the business and partners. A comment in response to such a gift has me feeling really thankful. </p>
<p>It attested to one of our goals as founders &#8211; treat people with respect, treat them like we&#8217;d like to be treated and build lasting relationships. Why is that so hard for companies to get? JetBlue had it and seems to have lost it. Virgin America seems to have grabbed a taste for it &#8211; let&#8217;s hope they keep it. But it seems hard for companies to keep building relationships with people that matter. The shortcut to profit and money always seem to get in the way &#8211; and I certainly have empathy for those who skip the relationship part &#8211; or at least make large compromises in that effort, but it is indeed short-sighted. When you treat customers and clients right 99% of the time, they&#8217;ll be more forgiving of mistakes in judgment, true? Anyway, a huge holiday &#8216;Cheers&#8217; to our clients at MM &#8211; we&#8217;re proud of the work we do for you, proud to have such great clients, and hope we all continue accelerating innovation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.evanadelman.com/2008/12/17/building-families/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

